Intracranial Stenosis – ICAD and Moyamoya

 

ICAD (Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease)

•   Also referred to as ICAS (Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis)

Trials

WASID

•   RCT aspirin vs Warfarin

•   No benefit of warfarin

•   More bleeds with warfarin

CLAIR

•   RCT Clopidogrel + Aspirin VS Aspirin

•   Recently symptomatic ICAS

•   Outcome was TCD microemboli – these were lower at day 2 and 7

•   Not powered to look at stroke outcomes, but appeared lower

SAMMPRIS

•   Medical management (including DAPT) VS Medical Mx + Stent

•   30 day stroke or death was 14.7% in stenting group vs 5.8% in Medical management

 

Moyamoya

•   Progressive stenosis pf the intracranial internal carotid arteries and their proximal branches

•   Moyamoya disease – Idiopathic

•   Moyamoya syndrome – Associated with another condition

 

Epidemiology

•   More common in Asia

o   Japan 3/100,000

o   Europe 0.3/100,000

o   USA 0.1/100,000

•   Age peaks: 5 years and 40 years

•   Male:Female 1:2

 

•   Associated conditions (i.e. Moyamoya syndrome)

o   Sickle cell disease

o   NF1

o   Cranial irradiation

o   Down’s syndrome

 

 

Clinical presentation

•   Ischaemic stroke             50-75%

•   TIA                                   50-75%

•   Haemorrhage                    10-40%

•   Headache

•   Seizures

•   Cognitive changes

•   Chorea

•   Morning glory optic disc

 

•   Haemorrhage

o   Intraventricular

o   Intraparenchymal (often basal ganglia)

o   Subarachnoid

 

Prognosis

~2/3 progress over 5 years without treatment

 

Treatment

•   Avoid hypotension

•   Anti-platelet generally recommended (although no trial evidence)

•   Calcium channel blockers for headache (with caution to avoid hypotension

•   Surgery

o   Direct revalcularisation – external carotid branch (e.g. superficial temporal artery) anastomosis to cortical artery

o   Indirect – tissue perfused by external carotid (e.g. dura or muscle) is place on the brain and allowed to anastamose over time.

 

References:

Moyamoya disease NEJM Review  2009